Audrey E. Kindlon [1]

Small businesses contribute to the U.S. economy by bringing growth and innovation and by being more adaptable to changes in the economy. Although extensive research has been done on small businesses—sometimes defined as fewer than 250 or 500 employees—very little is known about the smallest businesses, or microbusinesses.[2] This InfoBrief provides new information on microbusinesses and their research and development activities, strategies, and drivers of competitiveness.

Microbusinesses are defined in this InfoBrief as businesses with one to four employees.[3] According to the U.S. Census Bureau, microbusinesses made up more than one-half (56%) of all U.S. employer businesses in 2016.[4] In the same year, microbusinesses performed $4.8 billion of R&D in the United States (table 1), while businesses with five or more employees provide the vast majority ($375 billion) of R&D expenditures in the United States.[5] However, the smaller the business, the higher the R&D intensity, that is, the proportion of total sales that is dedicated to R&D (Anderson and Kindlon 2019).

TABLE 1. Total R&D performance for companies with 1–4 employees, by selected industry and type of R&D: 2016
(Thousands of U.S. dollars)
Industry NAICS code Total Basic
research
Applied
research
Development

NAICS = 2012 North American Industry Classification System.

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Industry classification is based on sample NAICS code. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States that performed or funded R&D.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 1 Source Data: Excel file

All industries 21–23, 31–33, 42–81 4,843,494 409,200 1,852,038 2,582,255
Manufacturing industries 31–33 554,091 36,282 222,024 295,786
Chemicals 325 118,986 4,682 57,621 56,682
Fabricated metal products 332 26,848 1,437 12,498 12,913
Machinery 333 114,951 7,167 49,395 58,389
Computer and electronic products 334 134,686 6,232 50,581 77,872
Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 335 23,861 827 7,291 15,743
Transportation equipment 336 29,131 3,943 7,923 17,265
Miscellaneous 339 76,731 8,351 25,868 42,512
Other manufacturing industries other 31–33 28,898 3,643 10,847 14,409
Nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 42–81 4,289,402 372,918 1,630,014 2,286,470
Wholesale trade 42 295,290 34,258 95,304 165,728
Electronic shopping and electronic auctions 454111–12 39,818 1,825 15,497 22,496
Information 51 239,024 24,257 73,155 141,611
Publishing 511 108,978 9,649 29,831 69,498
Software publishers 5112 108,978 9,649 29,831 69,498
Telecommunications 517 11,792 4,983 3,322 3,488
Data processing, hosting, and related services 518 63,032 5,772 18,893 38,367
Other information other 51 55,222 3,854 21,109 30,258
Professional, scientific, and technical services 54 3,577,353 282,465 1,407,771 1,887,117
Architectural, engineering, and related services 5413 381,344 18,364 189,913 173,067
Computer systems design and related services 5415 1,456,420 121,639 493,846 840,934
Scientific research and development services 5417 889,127 67,561 379,770 441,796
Biotechnology research and development 541711 337,866 26,069 151,232 160,565
Physical, engineering, and life sciences (except biotechnology) research and development 541712 529,224 39,067 215,896 274,261
Social sciences and humanities research and development 541720 22,037 2,424 12,642 6,971
Other professional, scientific, and technical services other 54 850,462 74,900 344,241 431,320
Other nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 44–49, 52–53, 55–56, 62, 71–72, 81 137,917 30,113 38,287 69,518

Data for this InfoBrief are from the Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDI-M), developed and cosponsored by the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics within the National Science Foundation and by the U.S. Census Bureau. Data from selected industries are highlighted in this InfoBrief. The BRDI-M survey was conducted only once. In the future, R&D data from microbusinesses will be collected by the Annual Business Survey (ABS).[6] Since 2016 was the first and only year the BRDI-M was conducted, some unknown measurement error is expected.

Characteristics of Microbusiness R&D Performance

By Industry

Microbusiness R&D is highly concentrated within a few industries. In 2016, R&D performance by microbusinesses in the United States was approximately $4.8 billion (table 1). Of this total, nonmanufacturing businesses reported $4.3 billion in R&D expenditures (89% overall). Nearly three-quarters (74%) of all microbusiness R&D expenditures are incurred by microbusinesses classified as professional, scientific, and technical services (North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] code 54). This contrasts with larger businesses of five or more employees, where 67% of R&D expenditures are incurred by manufacturing industries and where professional, scientific, and technical services make up just 10% of all R&D expenditures.[5]

By Type

More than one-half (53%) of microbusiness R&D expenditures in 2016 was spent on development, 38% on applied research, and 8% on basic research. Nearly identical proportions were reported by businesses in manufacturing and nonmanufacturing industries. This differs somewhat from businesses with five or more employees, where 77% of R&D was spent on development, 16% on applied research, and 7% on basic research.[5] Microbusinesses classified within the social sciences and humanities R&D industry (NAICS 541720) spent 57% of their R&D expenditures on applied research.

By Source of Funds

Most (78%) of the funding for R&D performance by microbusinesses was from the companies' own funds, whereas 8% each came from other U.S. companies or from federal, state, or local governments combined (table 2). Almost one-half (49%) of all government funding ($197 million of $406 million) for microbusiness R&D went to companies in the scientific R&D industry group (NAICS 5417). This government funding accounted for 22% of the funds for R&D that these businesses received.

TABLE 2. Total R&D performance for companies with 1–4 employees, by selected industry and source of funds: 2016
(Thousands of U.S. dollars)
Industry NAICS code Total Paid for by the
company
Foreign
owner
Another U.S.
company
Othera

S = suppressed for reliability; standard error exceeds publication standards.

NAICS = 2012 North American Industry Classification System.

a Other includes U.S. university or college, U.S. non-profit, U.S. federal government, U.S. state or local government or other sources.

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Industry classification based on sample NAICS code. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States that performed or funded R&D.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 2 Source Data: Excel file

All industries 21–23, 31–33, 42–81 4,843,494 3,779,668 107,587 410,451 545,788
Manufacturing industries 31–33 554,091 417,964 49,121 31,067 55,939
Chemicals 325 118,986 70,375 16,257 3,953 28,402
Fabricated metal products 332 26,848 21,702 0 S 0
Machinery 333 114,951 71,605 16,748 16,253 10,347
Computer and electronic products 334 134,686 112,413 3,831 4,549 13,894
Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 335 23,861 21,002 83 1,035 1,741
Transportation equipment 336 29,131 16,928 12,203 0 0
Miscellaneous 339 76,731 76,572 0 131 27
Other manufacturing industries other 31–33 28,898 27,367 0 0 1,531
Nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 42–81 4,289,402 3,361,704 58,466 379,383 489,850
Wholesale trade 42 295,290 252,644 6,579 28,767 7,300
Electronic shopping and electronic auctions 454111–12 39,818 39,070 0 749 0
Information 51 239,024 220,840 2,496 6,785 8,903
Publishing 511 108,978 98,016 2,496 2,952 5,514
Software publishers 5112 108,978 98,016 2,496 2,952 5,514
Telecommunications 517 11,792 11,792 0 0 0
Data processing, hosting, and related services 518 63,032 56,373 0 3,270 3,389
Other information other 51 55,222 54,658 0 564 0
Professional, scientific, and technical services 54 3,577,353 2,726,802 49,391 337,681 463,477
Architectural, engineering, and related services 5413 381,344 271,796 50 52,118 57,380
Computer systems design and related services 5415 1,456,420 1,202,993 24,629 131,207 97,592
Scientific research and development services 5417 889,127 576,986 14,848 48,832 248,461
Biotechnology research and development 541711 337,866 224,308 5,600 10,915 97,042
Physical, engineering, and life sciences (except biotechnology) research and development 541712 529,224 342,195 9,206 35,710 142,113
Social sciences and humanities research and development 541720 22,037 10,483 41 2,207 9,307
Other professional, scientific, and technical services other 54 850,462 675,027 9,865 105,524 60,045
Other nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 44–49, 52–53, 55–56, 62, 71–72, 81 137,918 122,349 0 5,401 10,169

By State

Microbusiness R&D is concentrated within a small number of states. Five states (California, New York, Texas, Massachusetts, and Florida) accounted for nearly one-half (49%) of all R&D performance by microbusinesses in 2016 (table 3). California accounted for 25% of the microbusiness R&D. In each state, microbusinesses R&D is mostly self-funded, as opposed to being paid for by others.

TABLE 3. Total R&D performance for companies with 1–4 employees, by state and source of funds: 2016
(Thousands of U.S. dollars)
State Total Source of funds
Paid for by the company Paid for by others

S = suppressed for reliability; standard error exceeds publication standards.

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States that performed or funded R&D.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 3 Source Data: Excel file

All states 4,843,494 3,779,668 1,063,826
Alabama 14,155 8,493 5,663
Alaska 1,154 660 493
Arizona 70,950 62,932 8,018
Arkansas 14,411 7,608 6,803
California 1,194,408 1,003,117 191,292
Colorado 114,389 90,049 24,340
Connecticut 71,880 61,654 10,226
Delaware 7,971 4,675 3,296
District of Columbia 11,965 8,079 3,886
Florida 237,130 198,444 38,686
Georgia 93,933 77,066 16,867
Hawaii S S S
Idaho S S 2,064
Illinois 162,022 120,131 41,891
Indiana 50,643 27,120 23,523
Iowa 30,624 20,584 10,040
Kansas 12,771 8,795 3,976
Kentucky 19,640 14,542 5,098
Louisiana 11,229 9,780 1,449
Maine 21,035 S S
Maryland 150,978 110,817 40,161
Massachusetts 267,037 182,514 84,523
Michigan 67,411 46,677 20,734
Minnesota 121,090 89,470 31,620
Mississippi 3,395 2,623 772
Missouri 23,465 20,140 3,324
Montana 9,629 5,252 4,377
Nebraska 19,053 16,308 2,745
Nevada 48,748 27,515 21,233
New Hampshire 21,715 15,535 6,181
New Jersey 150,029 125,280 24,749
New Mexico 20,260 13,202 7,058
New York 390,061 346,939 43,122
North Carolina 165,762 105,633 60,128
North Dakota S S S
Ohio 89,044 66,674 22,370
Oklahoma 45,354 43,316 2,038
Oregon 43,417 35,574 7,843
Pennsylvania 194,601 123,437 71,164
Rhode Island 15,570 12,545 3,025
South Carolina 38,267 33,657 4,609
South Dakota 5,823 5,542 281
Tennessee 32,301 26,738 5,563
Texas 302,041 235,493 66,547
Utah 43,950 32,448 11,501
Vermont 11,893 S 2,407
Virginia 149,361 95,826 53,536
Washington 131,326 107,777 23,549
West Virginia 1,396 1,270 126
Wisconsin 41,767 34,045 7,722
Wyoming S S 703
Undistributed 101 101 0

Total Employment and R&D Employees

Over one-half (56%) of R&D expenditures are used to pay for salaries, wages, and benefits; 10% is used for equipment; and 5% is for software purchases and licenses (table 4). The remaining 30% of R&D costs are for other expenses. Additional information is available in the data tables—see https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19323.

TABLE 4. Total R&D performance for companies with 1–4 employees, by selected industry and type of cost: 2016
(Thousands of U.S. dollars)
Industry NAICS code Total Salaries,
wages, and
fringe benefits
Equipment Software
purchases and
licenses
Other

D = data withheld to avoid disclosing operations of individual companies. S = suppressed for reliability; standard error exceeds publication standards.

NAICS = 2012 North American Industry Classification System.

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Industry classification based on sample NAICS code. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States that performed or funded R&D.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 4 Source Data: Excel file

All industries 21–23, 31–33, 42–81 4,843,494 2,713,154 467,592 227,276 1,435,472
Manufacturing industries 31–33 554,091 267,299 81,796 23,489 181,507
Chemicals 325 118,986 50,219 11,449 2,378 54,940
Fabricated metal products 332 26,848 15,349 S S S
Machinery 333 114,951 63,660 14,459 S 30,022
Computer and electronic products 334 134,686 68,224 19,200 6,465 40,796
Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 335 23,861 12,102 4,508 881 6,370
Transportation equipment 336 29,131 S 6,923 D D
Miscellaneous 339 76,731 24,740 16,928 D D
Other manufacturing industries other 31–33 28,898 15,288 2,218 D D
Nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 42–81 4,289,402 2,445,855 385,796 203,787 1,253,964
Wholesale trade 42 295,290 141,129 52,086 10,203 91,873
Electronic shopping and electronic auctions 454111–12 39,818 14,182 S 1,791 19,749
Information 51 239,024 166,281 11,544 11,110 50,089
Publishing 511 108,978 78,954 4,803 5,342 19,879
Software publishers 5112 108,978 78,954 4,803 5,342 19,879
Telecommunications 517 11,792 6,013 1,910 415 3,455
Data processing, hosting, and related services 518 63,032 38,629 2,825 2,553 19,025
Other information other 51 55,222 42,685 2,006 2,800 7,730
Professional, scientific, and technical services 54 3,577,353 2,060,127 294,449 178,130 1,044,647
Architectural, engineering, and related services 5413 381,344 227,603 45,313 21,414 87,014
Computer systems design and related services 5415 1,456,420 901,215 99,020 92,751 363,434
Scientific research and development services 5417 889,127 377,600 90,677 15,865 404,986
Biotechnology research and development 541711 337,866 120,159 26,759 5,506 185,442
Physical, engineering, and life sciences (except biotechnology) research and development 541712 529,224 244,199 62,841 9,632 212,552
Social sciences and humanities research and development 541720 22,037 13,241 1,077 727 6,992
Other professional, scientific, and technical services other 54 850,462 553,709 59,439 48,100 189,214
Other nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 44–49, 52–53, 55–56, 62, 71–72, 81 137,918 64,137 23,622 2,553 47,607

A small number of microbusinesses can be considered R&D businesses (that is, R&D-performing businesses). Among the R&D businesses, 51% of all workers[7]—including owners (both those who receive a W-2 and those who do not), employees, contractors, and unpaid workers—work on R&D (table 5). Because microbusinesses have so few employees, and most likely few workers, this is to be somewhat expected. For example, if one worker in a two-person company or two workers in a four-person company are working on R&D, that is 50% of the company. Of the about 106,000 R&D workers in microbusinesses, 89% work in the nonmanufacturing industries.

TABLE 5. Total number of R&D workers at R&D performing companies for companies with 1–4 employees, by selected industry: 2016
(Number)
Industry NAICS code Total number of
R&D workers at
R&D companies
Total number of
workers at R&D
companies

NAICS = 2012 North American Industry Classification System.

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Industry classification based on sample NAICS code. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States that performed or funded R&D. Workers includes owners, employees who receive a W-2, other paid workers, including contractors, consultants and temporary workers, and unpaid workers.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 5 Source Data: Excel file

All industries 21–23, 31–33, 42–81 105,906 206,152
Manufacturing industries 31–33 11,809 25,160
Chemicals 325 1,238 3,010
Fabricated metal products 332 1,257 2,359
Machinery 333 2,064 3,846
Computer and electronic products 334 2,480 4,494
Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 335 477 1,005
Transportation equipment 336 663 1,291
Miscellaneous manufacturing 339 1,872 4,735
Other manufacturing industries other 31–33 1,758 4,417
Nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 42–81 94,097 180,993
Wholesale trade 42 11,623 26,752
Electronic shopping and electronic auctions 454111–12 1,770 3,658
Information 51 5,823 12,642
Publishing 511 1,939 3,616
Software publishers 5,112 1,939 3,616
Telecommunications 517 299 864
Data processing, hosting, and related services 518 1,433 2,656
Other information other 51 2,151 5,505
Professional, scientific, and technical services 54 71,987 132,691
Architectural, engineering, and related services 5,413 10,928 17,482
Computer systems design and related services 5,415 26,669 48,473
Scientific research and development services 5,417 9,525 15,158
Biotechnology research and development 541,711 3,304 5,459
Physical, engineering, and life sciences (except biotechnology) research and development 541,712 5,700 8,932
Social sciences and humanities research and development 541,720 520 769
Other professional, scientific, and technical services other 54 24,865 51,577
Other nonmanufacturing industries 21–23, 44–49, 52–53, 55–56, 62, 71–72, 81 2,895 5,222

Microbusinesses and Business Strategies

When microbusinesses were asked what gives them a competitive advantage over other companies, they reported that quality is more important than low prices. Nearly 9 of 10 (88%) say that their reputation is very important in gaining a competitive advantage, and 85% say that quality of their goods or services is very important (table 6). Over one-half (53%) said that the convenience that their microbusiness offers is very important, whereas one-half (50%) said that the uniqueness of their goods and services is very important. One-quarter (25%) of microbusiness say that low prices are very important.

Table 6. Importance of strategies for companies with 1–4 employees: 2016
(Percent)
Strategies Companies
(number)
Very
important
Somewhat
important
Not at all
important

NOTES: Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Statistics are representative of companies located in the United States.

SOURCE: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, and U.S. Census Bureau, Microbusiness R&D and Innovation Survey, 2016.

Table 6 Source Data: Excel file

For competitive advantage
Your low prices 2,030,920 24.7 42.2 33.1
The quality of your goods or services 2,049,881 85.0 7.4 7.5
Your unique goods or services 2,032,351 50.2 28.4 21.4
The convenience you offer 2,033,359 52.6 30.3 17.2
Your reputation 2,043,038 88.0 6.1 5.8
For future success
Updating or improving an existing good or service 2,042,265 41.0 36.2 22.8
Developing a good or service that will save customers money 2,037,931 30.0 33.0 37.0
Developing a good or service that will improve current customers' experience 2,036,507 41.7 30.2 28.1
Having a formal business strategic plan in writing 2,037,473 12.6 29.5 57.9
Partnerships with other businesses 2,036,341 12.5 24.8 62.6
Partnerships with one or more universities 2,029,269 3.3 9.7 87.0
Providing individualized goods or services 2,035,762 31.6 27.0 41.4

Developing a good or service that will improve the current customer's experience was reported to be very important by 42% of microbusinesses. Nearly an identical percentage (41%) reported that updating or improving their existing goods and services was very important to their future success. Providing individualized goods or services (32%) or developing goods or services that will save customers money (30%) was determined to be very important to almost one-third of microbusinesses. However, having a business strategic plan in writing was very important to only 13% of microbusinesses. Partnerships were not considered as important to microbusinesses' future success—13% said partnerships with other businesses were very important, and only 3% said partnerships with universities were very important.

Survey Information and Data Availability

In this InfoBrief, expenditures are expressed in current U.S. dollars and are not adjusted for inflation. For BRDI-M, a microbusiness is defined as a business organization located in the United States, either U.S. owned or a U.S. affiliate of a foreign parent company, with at least one establishment under common ownership or control, and with one to four employees. The survey was administered to companies regardless of whether they were known to have R&D activity. BRDI-M collected detailed statistics from businesses on domestic R&D expenditures, R&D employees, intellectual property, business strategies, and innovation activities.

The sample for BRDI-M was selected to represent all for-profit businesses that have at least 1 but fewer than 10 paid employees in the United States. These businesses must also have at least one establishment that is in business during the survey year, be in the United States, and be classified in certain industries based on the 2012 NAICS. The survey sample focused on industries where it is expected that companies perform R&D in the United States. Only data on microbusinesses (those with one to four employees) are presented in this InfoBrief. The statistics from the survey are based on a sample, and as such, they are subject to both sampling and non-sampling errors (see technical notes in the data tables at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19323).

For 2016, a total of 199,991 companies were sampled to represent the population of 3,460,816 companies. The response rate for the 2016 BRDI-M was 77%.

The full set of data tables from this survey will be available in the report Microbusiness R&D and Innovation: 2016. Additional tables with relative standard errors and imputation rates from the 2016 survey are available from the author.

Note that the 2016 cycle of BRDI-M is the only time this survey will be administered. ABS, co-sponsored by NCSES and Census, will produce statistics for 2017 and beyond. In addition to R&D, the ABS will collect data on innovation and intellectual property.

Notes

[1] Audrey Kindlon, Research and Development Statistics Program, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite W14200, Alexandria, VA 22314 (akindlon@nsf.gov; 703-292-2332).

[2] Anderson G, Kindlon A. 2019. Indicators of R&D in Small Businesses: Data from the 2009–15 Business R&D and Innovation Survey. InfoBrief NSF 19-316. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2019/nsf19316/.

[3] The Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS) refers to businesses with five to nine employees as microbusinesses, but in this InfoBrief, microbusinesses are defined exclusively as businesses with one to four employees.

[4] U.S. Census Bureau, Business Dynamic Statistics. Firm Characteristics Data Tables. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/data_firm2016.html. Accessed February 2019.

[5] Wolfe R. 2018. Businesses Spent $375 Billion on R&D Performance in the United States in 2016. InfoBrief 18-312. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsf18312/.

[6] The ABS, first fielded in 2018, is the primary source of information on R&D expenditures for businesses with one to nine employees. The ABS also collects data related to innovation, intellectual property, technology, and business owner characteristics from those businesses with one or more employees. For additional information on the ABS, please see https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvyabs/.

[7] A distinction must be made between workers, which includes owners who do not receive a W-2, contractors, and unpaid workers, and employees. Microbusinesses have between one and four employees, but they may have more workers.