NSF
GPRA Strategic Plan
FY 2001 - 2006 |
|||||||||
HOME |
|||||||||
|
III. NSF’s Outcome Goals: Investing in today’s promise for tomorrow’s achievementIn pursuit of its historic mission, NSF invests in:
Issues of equal opportunity in science and engineering are addressed by all three of the outcome goals. In Appendix 5, Resource Utilization, NSF’s FY 2001 budget request is distributed across the three outcome goals and Administration and Management (A&M), with a total request of $4.572 billion. In Appendix 7: Crosswalk of NSF Goals and Programs, all NSF programs are classified according to the outcome goal on which they are primarily focused. However, is should be noted that there is considerable synergy among the goals. For example, a grant supporting materials research at a university may focus on producing new knowledge (Ideas) but also may help train the next generation of scientists and engineers (People), and provide new research equipment (Tools). The ability of NSF-supported projects to simultaneously address multiple outcome goals increases the effectiveness and productivity of NSF’s investments. A. PEOPLE: A diverse, internationally competitive and globally-engaged workforce of scientists, engineers and well-prepared citizens. NSF Statutory Authority: "The Foundation is authorized and directed to initiate and support basic scientific research and programs to strengthen scientific research potential and science education programs at all levels . . ." (NSF Act of 1950) "The Foundation is authorized to support activities designed to . . encourage women to consider and prepare for careers in science and engineering. . " (Science & Engineering Equal Opportunities Act; 42USC 1885) "The Foundation is authorized to undertake and support a comprehensive science and engineering education program to increase the participation of minorities in science and engineering . . ." (Science & Engineering Equal Opportunities Act; 42USC 1885) "The Foundation is authorized to undertake and support programs and activities to encourage the participation of persons with disabilities in the science and engineering professions." (Science & Engineering Equal Opportunities Act; 42USC 1885) NSF is committed to ensuring that the United States has world-class scientists and engineers, a national workforce that is scientifically, technically and mathematically strong, and a citizenry that understands and can take full advantage of basic concepts of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Every dollar NSF spends is an investment in people. The agency supports nearly 200,000 people – teachers, students, researchers, postdoctoral researchers, and many others. NSF supports formal and informal science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education at all levels. NSF employs three core strategies that guide the entire agency in establishing priorities, identifying opportunities, and designing new programs and activities: (1) Develop Intellectual Capital; (2) Integrate Research and Education; and (3) Promote Partnerships. (These strategies are more fully described in Section IV.) Each of these strategies is critical to accomplishing the People goal. In addition, there are implementation strategies that are specific to this goal:
The following long-term outcomes of the People Goal provide the basis for development of more specific and time-dependent annual performance goals:
Appendix 1 describes the critical factors for success that are identified for the outcome goals. In particular, Factor 1, operating a credible, efficient merit review system, is critical because it is at the very heart of NSF's selection of the projects through which its outcome goals are achieved. Factor 2, maintaining a diverse, capable, motivated staff that operates with efficiency and integrity is also critically important because it is the program staff that makes the final selection of projects to be supported, and then monitors performance. Appendix 2 describes the external factors that must be considered in developing goal achievement strategies. With regard to the People Goal, characteristics of the workforce of scientists and engineers are highly dependent on the systems through which they are educated and trained. NSF programs influence educational systems and the public that supports them, but are only one influence among many factors. As described in Appendix 3, Assessing NSF Performance, NSF performance is successful if the outcomes of NSF investments for a given period of time are judged to have achieved or to have made significant progress in achieving the specific performance goals. These assessments are made by independent external panels of experts, who use their collective experienced-based norms in determining the level of "significance" necessary for a rating of successful. B. IDEAS: Discovery across the frontier of science and engineering, connected to learning, innovation and service to society. NSF Statutory Authority: "The Foundation is authorized and directed to initiate and support basic scientific research and ... research fundamental to the engineering process . . ." (NSF Act of 1950) ". . . The Foundation is authorized to initiate and support specific scientific and engineering activities in connection with matters relating to scientific and engineering applications upon society. . ." (NSF Act of 1950) Investments aimed at discovery fund cutting edge research projects proposed by individuals and groups of scientists and engineers. Because no one can predict every discovery or anticipate all of the opportunities that fresh discoveries will produce, NSF's portfolio must be large and diverse, addressing many fields and activities, ranging from single investigator grants to small groups of investigators to large multi-purpose research centers. NSF-funded research projects also provide a rich foundation for broad and useful applications of knowledge and the development of new technologies. NSF is committed to fostering connections between discoveries and their use in the service to society. A key strategy for accomplishing this is by promoting partnerships at all levels. As described in Section IV, NSF employs three core strategies that guide the entire agency in establishing priorities, identifying opportunities, and designing new programs and activities. Each of these strategies is critical to accomplishing the Ideas goal. In addition, there are some implementation strategies that are specific to this goal. NSF will:
The following long-term outcomes for the Ideas goal provide the basis for development of more specific and time-dependent annual performance goals:
Appendix 1 describes the critical factors for success that are identified for the outcome goals. Appendix 2 describes the external factors that should be considered in developing goal achievement strategies. The work that results in the achievement of the IDEAS outcome goals is performed largely outside the agency; thus, external factors have a significant impact on NSF's performance. In general, these factors result from changes (social, political, physical, etc.) in the environment for the conduct of research and education activities in the federal sector, the private sector, and in academe. They stem largely from the fact that NSF does not conduct the research and education activities directly and, therefore, influences outcomes rather than controls them. As described in Appendix 3, Assessing NSF Performance, NSF performance is successful if the outcomes of NSF investments for a given period of time are judged to have achieved or to have made significant progress in achieving the specific performance goals. These assessments are made by independent external panels of experts, who use their collective experienced-based norms in determining the level of "significance" necessary for a rating of successful. C. TOOLS: Broadly accessible, state-of-the-art and shared research and education tools NSF Statutory Authority "The Foundation is authorized and directed to initiate and support basic scientific research and programs to strengthen scientific research potential and science education programs at all levels . . ." (NSF Act of 1950) "The Foundation is authorized and directed to foster and support the development and use of computer and other scientific and engineering methods and technologies, primarily for research and education in the sciences and engineering; . . ." (NSF Act of 1950) NSF investments provide state-of-the art tools for research and education, such as instrumentation and equipment, multi-user facilities, accelerators, telescopes, research vessels and aircraft, and earthquake simulators. In addition, investments in Internet-based and distributed user facilities, advanced computing resources, research networks, digital libraries, and large databases are increasing, as a result of rapid advances in computer, information, and communication technologies. NSF's investments are coordinated with those of other organizations, agencies and countries to provide complementarity and integration. As described in Section IV, NSF employs three core strategies that guide the entire agency in establishing priorities, identifying opportunities, and designing new programs and activities. Each of these strategies is critical to accomplishing the Tools goal. In addition, there are some implementation strategies that are specific to this goal:
The following long-term outcomes for the Tools goal provide the basis for development of more specific and time-dependent annual performance goals:
Appendix 1 describes the critical factors for success that are identified for the outcome goals. Appendix 2 describes the external factors that must be considered in developing goal achievement strategies. For example, NSF relies on the academic research facilities and platforms available at colleges and universities across the country to provide a base upon which grantees can build their research programs. Although NSF support enhances this infrastructure, we do not control its current condition and quality. Failing to maintain a state-of-the-art research infrastructure will slow the pace of discovery and limit the research options available to researchers. As described in Appendix 3, Assessing NSF Performance, NSF performance is successful if the outcomes of NSF investments for a given period of time are judged to have achieved or to have made significant progress in achieving the specific performance goals. These assessments are made by independent external panels of experts, who use their collective experienced-based norms in determining the level of "significance" necessary for a rating of successful. |
||||||||
|